POWER WITHOUT ACCOUNTABILITY IS A
RECIPE FOR DISASTER AND CORRUPTION
Local investigations
Public accountability
Keeping them honest
👋 Welcome to Council Watch Australia
Shining a light on your local government.
At Council Watch Australia, we believe ratepayers deserve transparency, accountability, and value for money.
We’re a national watchdog committed to exposing waste, highlighting governance failures, and standing up for the communities that councils are meant to serve.
Whether it’s skyrocketing rates, shady deals, dodgy planning decisions, or taxpayer-funded junkets, we track it, report it, and fight back. Our mission is simple: to hold councils across the country to account — from Broome to Ballarat, Parramatta to Port Lincoln.
🔍 Investigations. 📣 Advocacy. 💬 Community Voice. 📊 Data-driven insights.
We’re not funded by government. We don’t play party politics. We’re here for you — the residents, ratepayers, and businesses who expect better from their local council.
If you think your council has forgotten who it works for, you’re not alone.
Join the growing movement for real local democracy and clean governance.
👉 Welcome to Council Watch. Eyes on every council. All across Australia.
RATE HIKE PETITION
SAY NO TO MASSIVE INCREASES
The Northern Beaches Council’s proposal to increase rates by up to 46% is DISGUSTING, UNFAIR AND FLAWED.
SAY NO - please sign our petition.
It appears that some Councillors are already lobbying for these massive rates increases
The "Your Say" questionnaire process is flawed.
Key Issues with the Consultation Process
Order Influences Perception: By placing “Improve Services” at the top of the list and “Increase Services” at the bottom, the Council subtly frames the former as the most reasonable option while portraying the latter as extreme. This biased framing leads participants toward the Council’s preferred middle-ground option, which still involves significant rate increases.
False Dichotomy of Choices: The consultation restricts feedback to service levels tied directly to rate hikes, excluding alternative approaches such as cost-cutting measures or internal efficiencies. This framework prevents residents from voicing innovative solutions or expressing opposition to rate increases altogether.
Feedback Mechanism Bias: By requiring participants to rank all options, the Council effectively coerces respondents into legitimising rate increases. This data can then be manipulated to present an artificial consensus in support of higher rates.
Selective Framing of Impact: The descriptions of the options likely emphasise negative consequences for “Reduce Services” while highlighting benefits for “Maintain Services” or “Improve Services.” This approach plays on community fears and pressures residents to accept rate hikes as inevitable.
The ranking system and the overall structure of the consultation process raise serious concerns about the integrity of the feedback mechanism. Rather than genuinely capturing community sentiment, the consultation appears more focused on justifying predetermined outcomes that align with the Council’s interests.
A Call for Fair and Transparent Consultation.
We call on the Northern Beaches Council to adopt a more transparent and inclusive approach to consultation. A fair process should:
-
Include options that explore cost-cutting measures and innovative funding solutions within the existing budget.
-
Present choices in a neutral and unbiased manner.
-
Allow participants to reject rate increases outright without coercion.
-
Clearly outline how feedback will be interpreted and used to inform decisions.
The community deserves leadership that prioritises cutting waste, addressing inefficiencies, and exploring alternative funding options rather than passing financial burdens onto residents. The Northern Beaches ‘Shadow’ Council is committed to standing up for the community, advocating for smarter governance, and ensuring that public voices are genuinely heard in all decision-making processes.
PETITION
